Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9100 vs AMD FirePro W4300

AMD FirePro W9100 vs AMD FirePro W4300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9100 +266%
5.238 TFLOPS
FirePro W4300
1.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Dec 2015
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
768
176
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1428 GFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.28 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Bonaire
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy