Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

AMD FirePro W9100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (275W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9100 +778%
5.238 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
448bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
44
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
240
176
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GT200B
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

275W
TDP
289W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy