Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9100 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

AMD FirePro W9100 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (275W vs 320W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
6912 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9100
5.238 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4080 +830%
48.74 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Sep 2022
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2205 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6X
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
716.8GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
76
2816
Shading Units
9728
176
TMUs
304
64
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
280.6 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
761.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
48.74 TFLOPS
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.74 TFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
761.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
320W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
AD103
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
AD103-300-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy