Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9100 vs NVIDIA NVS 300

AMD FirePro W9100 vs NVIDIA NVS 300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
2800 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9100 +13330%
5.238 TFLOPS
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Jan 2011
FirePro
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
44
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
16
176
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GT218
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

275W
TDP
18W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy