Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9100 vs AMD Radeon RX 6300

AMD FirePro W9100 vs AMD Radeon RX 6300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 and 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 6300 's Advantages
Boost Clock2040MHz
Lower TDP (32W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9100 +67%
5.238 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6300
3.133 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
32bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
768
176
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
32W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x HDMI 2.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Navi 24
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy