Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD Instinct MI300X

AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD Instinct MI300X

We compared a Desktop platform GPU: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and a Professional market GPU: 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
19136 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X +32777%
163.4 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Dec 2023
FireStream
Generation
Instinct
Desktop
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
4
Compute Units
304
320
Shading Units
19456
16
TMUs
880
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
MI300
-
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
146 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Board Design

105W
TDP
750W
300 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy