Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs Intel Arc A750

AMD FireStream 9170 vs Intel Arc A750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 8GB VRAM Arc A750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 225W)
Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
3264 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Arc A750 +3360%
17.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Oct 2022
FireStream
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2050 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
3584
16
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
28
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
268.8 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
537.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
34.41 TFLOPS
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.20 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.150 TFLOPS

Board Design

105W
TDP
225W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy