AMD FireStream 9170 vs Intel Arc Pro A40
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A40
+600%
3.482 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Aug 2022
FireStream
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.40 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.963 TFLOPS
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
870.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
50W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV670
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
