AMD FireStream 9170 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.33GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
280 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (32W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
+1453%
0.497 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Jan 2009
FireStream
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
802 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
40
16
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
105W
TDP
32W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV670
GPU Name
RV620
-
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1
