Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
104 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (105W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 +7%
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Sep 2008
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
802 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
320
Shading Units
216
16
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

105W
TDP
182W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
GT200
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy