CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
VS
AMD FireStream 9170
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
104 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (105W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
+7%
0.536 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
VS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Sep 2008
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
802 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
320
Shading Units
216
16
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
182W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV670
GPU Name
GT200
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
2
AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
3
AMD FireStream 9170 vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1
4
AMD FireStream 9170 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB
5
AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
6
AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2
7
AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD Radeon R9 370
8
AMD FireStream 9170 vs ATI FirePro V3700
9
AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM
10
AMD FireStream 9170 vs ATI Radeon HD 4650
Related News
1
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
2
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
3
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
4
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
5
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
6
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
7
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
8
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
9
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
10
World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy