Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD FirePro S7150

AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD FirePro S7150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150 +658%
3.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Feb 2016
FireStream
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
802 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
2048
16
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
117.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.537 TFLOPS
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.768 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
235.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

105W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
Tonga
-
GPU Variant
Tonga XT GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
5 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy