Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs ATI FirePro V8700

AMD FireStream 9170 vs ATI FirePro V8700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (105W vs 151W)
ATI FirePro V8700 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (108.8GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
FirePro V8700 +141%
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Sep 2008
FireStream
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
802 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
108.8GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
800
16
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

105W
TDP
151W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy