Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD FirePro W7100

AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD FirePro W7100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 8GB VRAM FirePro W7100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro W7100 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
FirePro W7100 +563%
3.297 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Aug 2014
FireStream
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
802 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1792
16
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.297 TFLOPS
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.297 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
206.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

105W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
Tonga
-
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
5 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy