Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM

AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 512MB VRAM GeForce G210 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.33GB/s vs 8.064GB/s)
304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (31W vs 105W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170 +1055%
0.497 TFLOPS
GeForce G210 OEM
0.043 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
May 2009
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
802 MHz
Memory Clock
504 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
8.064GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
4
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
16
16
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
43.20 GFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
G96C
-
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²

Board Design

105W
TDP
31W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy