Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs ATI FirePro V7900

AMD FireStream 9170 vs ATI FirePro V7900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 +273%
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
May 2011
FireStream
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
802 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
4
Compute Units
20
320
Shading Units
1280
16
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
Cayman
-
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Board Design

105W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy