Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 105W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +267%
1.828 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Mar 2016
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1026 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
768
16
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
-
-
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

105W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
GM206
-
GPU Variant
GM206-251-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy