Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 980 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1076MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 980 Ti +1119%
6.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Jun 2015
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1076 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
336.6GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
2816
16
TMUs
176
16
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
103.3 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
189.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.060 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
189.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

105W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
GM200
-
GPU Variant
GM200-310-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
8 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy