AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA NVS 310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.33GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
272 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (20W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
+397%
0.497 TFLOPS
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Jun 2012
FireStream
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
802 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
320
Shading Units
48
16
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
-
-
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
20W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV670
GPU Name
GF119
-
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
