Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
4800 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6900X +4330%
22.02 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Aug 2021
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2150 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
80
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
5120
16
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
80
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
275.2 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
688.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.03 TFLOPS
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.02 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1376 GFLOPS

Board Design

105W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
Navi 21
-
GPU Variant
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy