Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 16 years late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
2752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7700 +6328%
31.95 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Nov 2023
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
48
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
3072
16
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
249.6 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
499.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
63.90 TFLOPS
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.95 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

105W
TDP
190W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
Navi 32
-
GPU Variant
Navi 32
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy