Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.33GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 105W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250 OEM +62%
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Oct 2013
FireStream
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

105W
TDP
65W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
Oland
-
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy