Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285 +561%
3.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Sep 2014
FireStream
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
802 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
4
Compute Units
28
320
Shading Units
1792
16
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.38 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.290 TFLOPS
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.290 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
205.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
Tonga
-
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
5 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Board Design

105W
TDP
190W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy