AMD FireStream 9250 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro 5700 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1350MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5700
+522%
6.221 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Aug 2020
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1243 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
2304
40
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
194.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.44 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.221 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
388.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
130W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Navi 10
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Navi 10 XLA
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5
