AMD FireStream 9250 vs AMD Radeon Pro V320
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 230W)
AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
2784 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V320
+975%
10.75 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jun 2017
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Pro Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
852 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
56
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
3584
40
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
230W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Vega 10
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER
(215-0894144)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
