AMD FireStream 9250 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 32MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 PCI 32 MB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 32GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 2.656GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 150W)
Score
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Unknown
FireStream
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 4x
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
993 MHz
Memory Clock
166 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
32MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
2.656GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
-
40
TMUs
2
16
ROPs
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.0 MPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.0 MTexel/s
-
-
-
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
15W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
VSA-101
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Daytona
(355-0025-221)
TeraScale
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
180 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
6.0
3.3
OpenGL
1.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
-
