Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9250 vs AMD FirePro W4300

AMD FireStream 9250 vs AMD FirePro W4300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
FirePro W4300 +42%
1.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Dec 2015
FireStream
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
10
Compute Units
12
800
Shading Units
768
40
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.64 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1428 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.28 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
Bonaire
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy