AMD FireStream 9270 vs Intel Arc Pro A40
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A40
+190%
3.482 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Aug 2022
FireStream
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
1024
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.40 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.963 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
870.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
160W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
DG2-128
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
