Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +268%
4.416 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Nov 2019
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1725 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
800
Shading Units
1280
40
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.20 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
138.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.832 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.416 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
138.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
TU116
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
TU116-250-KA-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net