Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9270 vs AMD FirePro W600

AMD FireStream 9270 vs AMD FirePro W600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270 +56%
1.2 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jun 2012
FireStream
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
512
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
Cape Verde
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy