Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM

AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 340 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 27.20GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (69W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270 +366%
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 340 OEM
0.257 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Feb 2010
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
27.20GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
800
Shading Units
96
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
257.3 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

160W
TDP
69W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
GT215
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
GT215-301-A3
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
4.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy