AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 8 GB GDDR5X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 8GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1060 8 GB GDDR5X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 8 GB GDDR5X 's Advantages
Boost Clock1709MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.3GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (120W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1060 8 GB GDDR5X
+264%
4.375 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Unknown
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1506 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1709 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1001 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
256.3GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
800
Shading Units
1280
40
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
109.4 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
136.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
68.36 GFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.375 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
136.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
160W
TDP
120W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GP104
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
GP104-150-KA-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
