Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM

AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 205 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
784 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Lower TDP (31W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270 +2566%
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce 205 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Nov 2009
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
800
Shading Units
16
40
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

160W
TDP
31W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
GT218
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
GT218-200-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
4.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy