Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
584 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (160W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270 +123%
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Nov 2008
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
800
Shading Units
216
40
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
171W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
GT200B
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy