Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE

AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 SE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 91.87GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (150W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270 +41%
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 560 SE
0.848 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Feb 2012
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
957 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
91.87GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
800
Shading Units
288
40
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.832 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.33 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
847.9 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
70.66 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
GF114
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
GF114-200-KB-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy