AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
32 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
+52%
1.828 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Mar 2016
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1026 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
768
40
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
160W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GM206
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
GM206-251-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
