Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9270 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition

AMD FireStream 9270 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition +138%
2.867 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Mar 2013
FireStream
Generation
Southern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
1792
40
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.60 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.867 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
716.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
200W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
Tahiti
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy