AMD FireStream 9270 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 1000W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
18656 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI325X
+6710%
81.72 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Oct 2024
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
288GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
304
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
19456
40
TMUs
1216
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2553.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
160W
TDP
1000W
450 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
153 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
N/A
