AMD FireStream 9270 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
32 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6400
+198%
3.58 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Jan 2022
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2331 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2331 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
768
40
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.59 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.161 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.580 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
160W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Navi 24
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL-W
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
