Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9270 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT

AMD FireStream 9270 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1845MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
608 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300 XT +333%
5.196 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Oct 2019
FireStream
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1670 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1845 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
22
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
1408
40
TMUs
88
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.04 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
162.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.39 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
324.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
Navi 14
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XL
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy