Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9270 vs AMD Radeon RX 6400

AMD FireStream 9270 vs AMD Radeon RX 6400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 6400 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2321MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
Lower TDP (53W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6400 +197%
3.565 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jan 2022
FireStream
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1923 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2321 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
768
40
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.27 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.130 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.565 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
53W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
Navi 24
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL (215-135000046)
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy