Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9270 vs AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

AMD FireStream 9270 vs AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6950 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 335W)
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2310MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
4320 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6950 XT +1870%
23.65 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
May 2022
FireStream
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1860 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2310 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
80
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
5120
40
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
80
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
295.7 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
739.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
47.31 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.65 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1478 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
335W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
Navi 21
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
Navi 21 KXTX (215-121000289)
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy