Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD Radeon Pro V420

AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD Radeon Pro V420

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 32GB VRAM AMD Radeon Pro V420 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Pro V420 's Advantages
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (819.2GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
2656 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
AMD Radeon Pro V420 +590%
13.93 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Unknown
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Pro Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
800 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
819.2GB/s

Render Config

18
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
4096
72
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.8 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
435.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.85 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.93 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.963 TFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Vega 20
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
Vega 20 GLXT WS (215-0914026)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy