AMD FireStream 9350 vs Intel Arc A750
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 8GB VRAM Arc A750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
2144 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
Arc A750
+753%
17.2 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Oct 2022
FireStream
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2050 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
3584
72
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
28
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
268.8 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
537.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
34.41 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.20 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.150 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
DG2-512
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
