AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 185W)
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
864 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
CMP 40HX
+277%
7.603 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Feb 2021
FireStream
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1470 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
36
1440
Shading Units
2304
72
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
237.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.21 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.603 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
237.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
185W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
TU106
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
TU106-100-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.8
