AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
864 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+184%
5.728 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Apr 2017
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
2304
72
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
Ellesmere
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7
