Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9350 vs ATI FirePro V9800

AMD FireStream 9350 vs ATI FirePro V9800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
FirePro V9800 +34%
2.72 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Sep 2010
FireStream
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
18
Compute Units
20
1440
Shading Units
1600
72
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.720 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
544.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Cypress
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy