AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
1376 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+495%
12 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Feb 2024
FireStream
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
1440
Shading Units
2816
72
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
70W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
AD107
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.7
