AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD FirePro W600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
+162%
2.016 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Jun 2012
FireStream
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
512
72
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1
