Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD FirePro W9100

AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD FirePro W9100

AMD FireStream 9350
VS
AMD FirePro W9100
AMD FireStream 9350
AMD FirePro W9100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
1376 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
FirePro W9100 +159%
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Mar 2014
FireStream
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

18
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
2816
72
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
275W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Hawaii
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy