AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1424 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
+5660%
2.016 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Oct 2009
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
1440
Shading Units
16
72
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.900 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
31W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
GT216
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.0
Shader Model
4.1
